New Idea for Health Care
67
New Idea for Health Care
A New Health Care Idea.
Well this should open the preverbal can of worms. We all want to see that all Americans can get affordable healthcare. Obama set out to do that. But the law that he signed is a disaster. While it’s a mess it does have some good points, very few. Despite the best efforts of Obamacare, not all Americans will have health insurance. In addition, over 45% of all companies will drop health care benefits and just pay the $2,000 fine. Many companies and Unions who wanted this law are opting out of the coverage and Obama is signing off on them. If it is so good why is everyone bailing on it? Not to mention all the additional taxes we must pay. And despite that, Medicare will still go broke soon.
So it is a tough undertaking to get all Americans health insurance. What we need is a policy that is affordable, covers everything, not just some illnesses or short change treatments, needs to allow pre existing conditions, needs to not lapse if someone loses their job, needs to cover prescriptions, needs to be there for the elderly, not need Government subsidies, and it needs to not burden Medicare .
Is it possible to achieve such a lofty goal? This system will take some time to put together and to implement, but it will address all of those concerns and many more.
The first thing that needs to be done is a group of representatives from all aspects of health care such as:
Doctors of Internal Medicine:
There are many subspecialties (or subdisciplines) of internal medicine:
- Cardiology
- Critical care medicine
- Endocrinology
- Gastroenterology
- Geriatrics
- Hematology
- Hepatology
- Infectious diseases
- Nephrology
- Oncology
- Pediatrics
- Pulmonology/Pneumology/Respirology
- Rheumatology
- Sleep medicine
Surgery
Surgery has many sub-specialties, including:
- general surgery
- cardiovascular surgery,
- colorectal surgery,
- neurosurgery,
- maxillofacial surgery,
- orthopedic surgery,
- otolaryngology,
- plastic surgery,
- oncologic surgery,
- transplant surgery,
- trauma surgery,
- urology,
- vascular surgery,
- pediatric surgery.
· In some centers, anesthesiology is part of the division of surgery ophthalmology and dermatology, but are not considered surgical sub-specialties per se.
Diagnostic specialties
- Clinical laboratories
- Pathology
- Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Polysomnography
Other major specialties
The followings are some major medical specialties that do not directly fit into any of the above mentioned groups.
- Anessthesiology
- Dermatology
- Emergency Medicine
- Family Medicine, Family Practice, General Practice or Primary Care
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Medical Genetics
- Neurology
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatrics
- Physical Medicine and rehabilitation
- Psychiatry
- Preventive Medicine
- Occupational Medice
Interdisciplinary fields
Some interdisciplinary sub-specialties of medicine include:
Addiction Medicine
Medical Ethics
Biomedical
Clinical Pharmacology
Conservation Medicine
Disaster Medicine
Forensic Medicine
Gender Based Medicine
Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Hospital Medicine
Laser Medicine
Medical Information
Pain Management
Sexual Medicine
Sports Medicine
Therapeutics
In addition we should assemble Hospital Administrators, Physician assistants, Nurse Practitioners, Certified Nurses Assistants.
All the representatives shall meet to create a Health Care Procedure Manual. Basically, they will establish protocols for all Illnesses, Diseases, Surgeries, Preventative Medicine, etc. It will outline all steps to be taken to address everything from Diagnoses, to Recovery on everything from the common cold to complex surgeries and all the steps needed to ensure complete and proper recovery.
After the manual is completed a consensus as to affixing a set cost for all procedures. This can be done by consulting the medical community as to what the average cost is per procedure. Those fees should be examined, negotiated to get the lowest price as possible. Once the monetary value is set, those numbers will lock in place for the first 3 years. The costs will be evaluated every 3 years after that by a panel of 60 people from the medical field, congress, and citizens. The panel will be called Medical Community Panel. They will hold hearings, listen to testimony and come to a conclusion. A rate increase can only be approved with a 2/3 majority vote. The people who serve on this board cannot be serving on the Insurance Policy Panel. It should be noted that procedures will change due to new discoveries of medicine, new technology, and new discovery of cure or better procedures to improved medical care. These changes will occur at any time and will go into effect as soon as they are approved by the Medical Panel.
Once the manual is completed with procedures and reparations, it will be presented to ALL medical insurance providers. They will bid on the cost of health insurance coverage to provide coverage as prescribed in the Medical manual. The lowest bid will be the cost of the policy for the American people. This also will be locked for 3 years. As with the costs the medical community, the insurers will be evaluated by a board of 60 people called The Insurance Policy Panel. They will hold hearings, listen to testimony and come to a conclusion. A rate increase can only be approved with a 3/4 majority vote. The people who serve on this board cannot be serving on the Medical Community Panel.
All health care insurance providers will charge no more than the set price. Any insurer found violating this rule will be fined $ 25,000 per offense. The insured will have the option of choosing any health insurance provider. All health care providers will cover all procedures specified in the Health Care Procedure Manual. Any deviation, refusal of a medical procedure clearly shows in Health Care Procedure Manual, or refusal to pay for said procedure will receive a fine of $30,000 per offense. Should the action result in the death of a patient, The Insurance Policy Panel will meet to determine if the insurer is responsible for the wrongful death. If so the insurer will compensate the family three (3) times the cost of the procedures needed to care for the patient according to the Health Care Procedure Manual. In addition they will compensate the family five (5) times the amount of lost wages, retirement benefits and Social Security benefits up to the national average of longevity. This wrongful death payment is compensation for wrongful death without going through the judicial system. Payment to the surviving family will be made within 90 days of the board
Determining in favor of the family. The board shall meet within 90 days of the passing of the insured. The Board must come to a determination within 30 days of convening. Should the board find no wrongful death, the family has the right to take the insurer to the judicial system to seek damages. The insurer will abide by any court decision. Should the insurer be found responsible by the court, the payment will be made within 90 days. I either by court or by panel review the insurer is found to be responsible and not make the payment within the 90 day time period, the insurer will pay a fine of $25,000 per day they are late In addition, the amount due the surviving family, the insurer will add 25% interest to the fund until paid.
The 60 person panel will consist of 25 from the medical community, 25 citizens, and 10 members of Congress broken down as 5 from the Senate 5 from the House of Representatives. The 10 will also breakdown as 5 Republicans 5 Democrats No one from the Ethics Committee can serve on either panel.
In order for someone to serve on either The Medical Community Panel or The Insurance Policy Panel they need to submit their name for consideration. The House Ethics Committee will do the vetting on each candidate. They will vote to appoint a candidate to the board. The names will be sent to the President for final approval. Should the President reject a candidate the ethics Committee can override the President with a 75% majority vote. Once a candidate is on the panel they will serve a term of 6 years. A candidate can reapply for a second term but they must go through the entire process once more. No one can serve more than two (2) terms. Should a panel member resign, a replacement will be chosen from the list of applicants and they will be subject to the approval process. The replacement will serve out the remainder of the term but this time will not count towards the full two (2) terms that can be served. At no time can the Ethics Committee or the President appoint a replacement. An empty seat will remain empty till an applicant completes the entire process.
How will this system work and how is it paid for?
Basically Every American once they hit the age of 18 will get this policy. Upon birth, the infant will attach to the fathers policy. If the insured is going to college at the age of 18 they will remain on the responsible parent policy. (A responsible parent will be defined as the father first, the mother second. A child from birth will attach to the fathers policy. In the event of a single parent, they will be the responsible party. In event of a death the child will attach to the remaining spouses policy. In the event both parent pass, they will go on Medicaid till 18 years of age). This policy will stay with the insured until the passing of the insured. they will remain on the parents policy until the completion of college or the persons 26th birthday. At that time, they will be issued a policy in their name.
At the start of the program, companies that provide employees with health benefits will cease. The funds paid by the employer to the insurance provider will be paid to the employee in their weekly paychecks. It will no longer be the responsibility to insure employees, but those funds will always be paid to the current and future employees. In addition, the minimum wage must increase to an amount that allows for the employee to afford the piece of the insurance policy. For example if a policy is $400 per month it would cost $ 2.50 per hour. So minimum wage needs to increase by $2.50 per hour. The cost of the insurance policy plus 10% will be taken from the employee each pay period much like Social Security is. Those funds will be sent to the government to be placed in an account that the employee can check on at anytime. This will be a non interest, non investable, and funds can never be removed by the insured or by the US government. The only role the US government will have in this is to receive the funds Use them to make the payments to the Insurance provider, and maintain accurate records. The additional 10% will be held in the account. It will accrue until needed. Those funds can be used to keep paying for the policy on the insured should they lose their job (taking the place of cobra therefore saving the insured money). Coverage will not lapse. Payments will be made from those funds until the insurer returns to employment. When they do, in addition to the 10% another 5 % will be reduced to pay back the account the funds used to keep the employee insured. The reason for the extra 10% is simple. When the insurer retires there will be enough in the fund to continue to make payments and keep the policy in force. That way the elderly are insured and do not have to go on Medicare (no more Part B, no more forcing the elderly to take Medicare, saving Medicare money). The saving to Medicare will be huge and should relieve Medicare the stress of providing health care for so many. It will not go broke on this system as the demand for Medicare will drop enormously. . Those funds in Medicare can cover those under 18 without parents, those in foster care, and those in orphanages, even the homeless when they wander into emergency rooms can be cared for by Medicare.
There will be a cost to the Government for maintaining the accounts, collecting the funds, distributing to the insurance companies. But this will not cost the Government any additional funds out of the budget. The funds saved from the Medicare program will more than be more than enough to fund the new Medical Oversight Department.
Since the policies will be the same no matter which company offers them, and the price will be dictated as to cost, An insured can choose any insurance company they want. Insurance companies will offer this policy in every state. They cannot choose to not participate in a specific state. Should it be discovered that a company is avoiding issuing policies in a particular state, they will lose the right to issue any new policies for a period of 3 years and pay a one million dollar fine.
Now this only represents a broad stroke of an idea. I am sure there can be improvements made to it. And I am sure if this was expanded on in congress. It would not take 12000 pages to become law.
Copyright 2011
American View encourages comments. In brief:
- Keep it civil and stay on topic
- No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
- People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.
The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. This blog and its contents are copyright protected 2011, all rights reserved
SAVE on Everything at My Amazon.com Store
You may be interested in these fine Hubs
- Calling Out Harry Reid
Everyday Congressmen and Senators get onto the floor of their respective chambers and give speeches on different topics. Then they'll gather in the rotunda to give news conferences blaming each other for the issue at hand doesn't get resolved. Of course now that it is campaign season, they give broader speeches, and at times their speech has nothing to do with the issue at hand for which they were supposed to be addressing. I want to make it clear that both sides are guilty of this, but am only - 44 hours ago
- IRS Loophole Enriches Undocumented Workers
Raising my kids I always told them to be responsible, to take responsibility for their actions. If you did something wrong, be honest, step up and take the punishment that may come for your actions. That’s what I have done my entire life and expect no more or less of my kids. I have been far from an angel in my life, but I took responsibility for my actions, including having been in jail, I never blame anyone nor do I expect anything. There should not be any rewards for not being responsible. - 3 days ago
- Walker Being Recalled
Well the Democrats and the unions are at it again in the state of Wisconsin. They haven't learned their lesson, they still want to be divisive, and of course they still want to waste money. I'm talking of the recall election of Gov. Scott Walker. The last attempts at a recall on the senators and congressmen of Wisconsin was a failure to the tune of $30 million spent by them. I have no idea how much they're spending this time, but the unions are bragging they are spending more that last election, - 7 days ago
- Can Obama Get Reelected in 2012
We all know that the presidential primaries are in full swing with all the noise Republicans are making. The Democratic primaries are currently going on at a much lower fevered pitch. After all what could there be to talk about, Obama is running unopposed, or is he. Turnout in most of the Democratic primaries has been light. In fact, if states did not have key races with Senators or Congressmen on the ballot, it would seem like turnout would be nonexistent. Of course so far in every state with - 2 weeks ago
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (6)
- Funny
- Awesome (4)
- Beautiful
- Interesting (3)
CommentsLoading...
I read this with great interest. You have definitely thought it out...
I am going to devote more than an initial reading and examine it thoroughly over the next few days(like I have any say in policy) and then I will give you a real opinion.
Most important, everyone should have medical care. Agreed!
There is a system set up that is called DRG's. Diagnosis Related Groups. Have worked with them for years. Many insurance companies, including Medicare, base their payments on this system. Simple definition: developed for the Health Care Financing Administration as a patient classification scheme which provides a means of relating the type of patients a hospital treats (i.e., its case mix) to the costs incurred by the hospital. While all patients are unique, groups of patients have common demographic, diagnostic and therapeutic attributes that determine their resource needs. The DRGs form a manageable, clinically coherent set of patient classes that relate a hospital's case mix to the resource demands and associated costs experienced by the hospital. Each discharge is assigned into a DRG based on the principal diagnosis, secondary diagnoses, surgical procedures, age, sex, and discharge status of the patient. So much of what you suggest is already present.
Today, payment all depends on the individual contract entered into between the hosp and ins co.
As an example, I was critically ill a few years ago. My hospital bill was $160,000. That does not include the doctors (about 10). My insurance co had a contract with the hospital that allowed them to pay $880.00 a day. Was in for 6 days = $5280.00
Quite a difference! If I had to pay cash, would have had to pay the full bill.
But like your ideas here!
Great Post..Keep it up buddy :)
The important thing is that health be cared for, not special interest groups. Health care reform should be about health care, not promises to someone that have absolutely nothing to do with health care.
Those responsible for creating a good health care policy should be the ones who USE health care; doctors, and patients.. They know what is needed and what they want.
Good article!
American, I will e-mail you personally. A good friend of mine is running for the Senate seat being vacated by KBH. He could be a much better source than myself. I will send him your Hub to look at.
I persuaded him to write on Hub, see Greg Lifschultz. His e-mail address is gregsenate2012@gmail.com
He is possibly the best source I can give you, at this time. H
Two things:
1- The cost of providing medical care is priced to include the costs of having to write off uninsured accounts that will never be collected on. Service providers include this cost in their calculations of what to charge the insurance companies.
Fewer uninsured would go a long way to lowering the overall cost of healthcare.
2- Health insurance companies are not in the business of insuring people. They are in the business of maximizing shareholder returns.
Its a great idea.
So how does one get over the political challenge of implementing a single payer system even though it is still built around private insurance companies?
The issue to this point has not been the lack of valid ideas. It has been the preponderance of mis information that are put forth by those seeking to maintain the status quo.
This is a very well thought out Hub. If only Washington would read it. Rated up!
Well done AV! You got your point across as always. Voted UP!
Excellent Hub. Excellent ideas. With some tweaks this could be a viable system. It will take tremendous will, work, and effort to get the wealthy and profitable groups involved to cooperate. But it could be done,
Are you aware of what Oregon State did about 20 years ago. They decided to cover everyone who did not already have insurance in one large pool...this with state funds which were limited of course. They pulled together the kind of panels of experts, specialists, and laypeople like you listed above and came up with two things.
Given that there was a limited amount of money that Oregon could put into this program, (1) they determined what fair and reasonable charges would be for each and every procedure, and (2) based of efficacy, value to the individual and to society (contagious and communicable diseases for example) they prioritized procedures, numbering them 1 through whatever and calculating how often that treatment or procedure would have to be paid based on the group who were being insured.
Some treatments and procedures give great medical benefit and cost savings - some not so much. Quality of life, length of life was factored in. Does it make sense to spend 100's of thousands on a heart procedure for someone in their eighties, when you could vaccinate and provide basic medical care to several hundred uninsured children?
I speak as someone who is closer to 80 than 0 and I think the amount of money we spend on end-of life procedures which result in two or three more years of life at best is crazy, when the same amount of money could give 5, 10, 20 years to several younger and healthier people.
Growing old, having problems, and dying is inevitable, but our doctors fight against it unreasonably and our hospitals and insurance companies profit from it. It is not healthy, it is not reasonable, and it is not financially sustainable.
I also speak as someone who buried her father last year (77). I loved him dearly, but I disagreed with the money the government spent on his care that resulted in minimal improvements, when there were uninsured children in my neighborhood who got no medical care at all, until they were bleeding and needed stitches at an Emergency Room...the most expensive care there is!!!
Back to Oregon...not every procedure made it on the list. The panels, after much discussion and deliberation, decided that some procedures were not cost effective. They provided so little benefit in comparison to the extraordinary cost that they didn't make it on the list. Care would be provided out of state funds for all the uninsured on a prioritized level until the funds ran out.
This did not limit medical care...If you had money or an additional policy that you paid for on your own you could obtain any procedure you wished. I thought it was brilliant, fair, compassionate, intelligent, reasonable, rational, and so forth.
I don't mention Oregon to replace your ideas, but I think some version of Oregon's plan should be part of your plan. I do not think we have the money to cover "every" procedure and we have got to be honest about that and deal with it.
One last example: imagine a scenario where you can treat childhood leukemia for 500,000 dollars with a 90% success rate in one child, or treat 10 children for the same amount with a 60% success rate. The latter is the better and moral choice, but it is currently not handled that way and it should be.
Could you look into the Oregon system and see what happened there(or Canada's system) and write about these sorts of prioritized approaches. Thank you very much.
SHARING
















American View Hub Author 11 months ago
Update. Since those of you I asked advise if you liked it and everyonem did, I have sent this idea to several Dem and Repub Congressman. Lets hope they will at least look at it and give it some consideration. I will keep you all informed